That pretty much addresses my first question, but only that, from what I can tell. > it would be wrong to compare my employer to a startup operating on angel f

That pretty much addresses my first question, but only that, from what I can tell. > it would be wrong to compare my employer to a startup operating on angel fumes Only if you pre-suppose your hand-wavey definition of good, which I noticed had very little in the way of qualities that affect actual working environment. > we are trying our damndest to grow our Toronto office even more. Including "welcoming" US workers? That's what I have yet to see any evidence of.