3 ms·
Good point. I'd be totally happy to go back to an 18-24 month update cycle. Big structural changes every two years and point updates with feature releases (wh
by mattkevan 8y ago
Good point.
I'd be totally happy to go back to an 18-24 month update cycle.
Big structural changes every two years and point updates with feature releases (which would normally be in a new version) and bug fixes.
No need to try and wedge everything into an annual release, especially if it's still buggy or unfinished.