3 ms·
What we are saying is : In the attempt at understanding the use cases of this proposal, people said in the thread webhooks were created to replace RSS+GET pull,
by antpls 8y ago
What we are saying is : In the attempt at understanding the use cases of this proposal, people said in the thread webhooks were created to replace RSS+GET pull, as an "enhancement".
As we are trying to explain : this proposal doesn't cover all use cases of RSS+GET pull, so it should not be considered a replacement of RSS nor an enhancement of it.
If WebSub has a purpose (if any), many people fail to explain a valid one. Does it worth wasting the resources of the W3C for such proposal?
The "world wide web" is wide, and doesn't only include servers
- rakoo 8y ago> people said in the thread webhooks were created to replace RSS+GET pull That's the root of our misunderstanding then: never was PubSubHubbub _replacing_ RSS+GET pull, it was supposed to _help_ it for people who want notifications, on top of the existing system.
- antpls 8y agoThe root of the misunderstandong is that their is no rational in the proposal. How are people supposed to understand any proposal without a rational?