Sorry, but what are we debating here? I never said that Facebook commuted a crime, or otherwise alleged that they acted maliciously. I asked a question about wh

Sorry, but what are we debating here? I never said that Facebook commuted a crime, or otherwise alleged that they acted maliciously. I asked a question about what the article meant by “algorithmic censors”, because I suspect the Guardian is conflating FB’s automated content flagging with its human censor system. Because it would be more of a concern (especially from a technical viewpoint) if FB’s automated system was attempting to discern in this kind of situation. A debate could be made over whether FB invests enough in its human censor system, perhaps, but I’m not getting into that here. BTW I didn’t and can’t downvote you — HN disallows authors from downvoting direct replies.