I didn't say it was. I said that we're not there yet, and implied that there will be mistakes along the way. Can you tell me what crime was committed here? As

I didn't say it was. I said that we're not there yet, and implied that there will be mistakes along the way. Can you tell me what crime was committed here? As noted in the Vindicator's own article: > While unhappy with Facebook’s action, the editor reminds readers that Facebook is a business corporation, not the government, and as such it is allowed to restrict use of its services as long as those restrictions do not violate any laws. Plus, The Vindicator is using Facebook for free, so the newspaper has little grounds for complaint other than the silliness of it. > The problem The Vindicator faces is that it has become dependent, perhaps too dependent, on Facebook to communicate with local residents and to promote the newspaper. Some Vindicator stories posted on thevindicator.com attract thousands of page views, but usually only after links to them are shared on Facebook. Plus, many bits of information are shared by the newspaper through Facebook alone. And review this announcement that they are building a tool to appeal decisions: https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2018/04/comprehensive-community-standards/ https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2018/04/comprehensive-community... What more do you want? Feel free to mention specifics instead of just downvoting me because I disagree with you.