I'm not arguing admin - which was clearly problematic. (I would get fired, for sure, for doing what he has done there) I'm curious about what policy moves he m

I'm not arguing admin - which was clearly problematic. (I would get fired, for sure, for doing what he has done there) I'm curious about what policy moves he made that made people angry. Maybe everyone is OK with his policy move? I don't get that this is the case... EDIT: More specifically - do people, hating his policy moves, make up admin stories about his egregious personal spend? I'm inclined to believe he was a corruptocrat, but the stories didn't come from political allies that liked his policy moves...