4 ms·
Talking admin and not policy, he had a number of issues. The secret calendars may have violated federal law, the large raises for his aides that the White House
by shakestheclown 8y ago
Talking admin and not policy, he had a number of issues. The secret calendars may have violated federal law, the large raises for his aides that the White House declined and he went around them and did anyway, the large increase in security detail costs and first class flights, the soundproof booth, having staffers book his hotels on their personal cards with no reimbursement, using staff to find his wife a job, making staff run personal errands, etc.
For a guy that supposedly believes in smaller government he seemed to waste a pretty fair amount of agency money.
- ci5er 8y agoI'm not arguing admin - which was clearly problematic. (I would get fired, for sure, for doing what he has done there) I'm curious about what policy moves he made that made people angry. Maybe everyone is OK with his policy move? I don't get that this is the case... EDIT: More specifically - do people, hating his policy moves, make up admin stories about his egregious personal spend? I'm inclined to believe he was a corruptocrat, but the stories didn't come from political allies that liked his policy moves...