5 ms·
>I think in order for the Bay Area (and California in general) to really become good for creatives, they need to take a deep existential look at themselves and
by aphextron 8y ago
>I think in order for the Bay Area (and California in general) to really become good for creatives, they need to take a deep existential look at themselves and really decide that they're willing to solve the problems. That means making radical, Marshall Plan levels of reform to zoning and property tax laws, establishment of strong regional metropolitan governments, and significant investments in better transportation.
And this will never, ever happen. California is going to continue it's slide into something resembling the third world, where the ultra-rich elite 10% live in their exurban gated communities with armed guards, and a permanent underclass of service workers provides for their every need while barely scraping out an existence. The incentives pushing things in this direction are simply too great for any kind of change to happen. I've been here for 4 years now and have seen it visibly getting worse in that time. The place is completely unlivable. I'm now just biding my time to save for a down payment in Seattle or Portland, because the thought of buying a house here has literally become a punchline for even high income earners.
- jonbarker 8y agoHaving lived there and now living in a cheaper real estate market I am grateful for having lived there, where I could not afford a house. I am now no longer interested in owning residential real estate no matter where I go!
- kyledrake 8y agoThe housing market is flooded with buyers right now, all-cash offers and waived inspections. It's obvious to me that most buyers don't realize the risks associated with their investment, don't understand how to monetize them against rents from long-term buyers, and are just generally thinking emotionally and irrationally. Terrible market to buy in if you don't like spending the rest of your life paying off a money pit, unless you're somewhere like Cleveland where there's a lot of decent supply and less demand (I saw some pretty solid houses there for ~50k). Good general rule of thumb is your cost of housing shouldn't exceed 30% of your income.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- jonbarker 8y agoTo that I'd add if you buy make sure you are pretty sure you will be in the local market for work for 6-7 years, so even if the mortgage is below 30% and rent is more like 50% if you aren't confident you'll stay put for a while you still shouldn't buy. I think there is an irrational scramble to buy going on now too although I think it is not at the scale that caused the global financial crisis.
- tedmiston 8y ago> Good general rule of thumb is your cost of housing shouldn't exceed 30% of your income. The 40x rule in New York (annual income must be at least 40x monthly rent) conveniently works out to be 30% too. https://www.nakedapartments.com/guides/nyc/beginning-your-search/calculate-your-maximum-rent https://www.nakedapartments.com/guides/nyc/beginning-your-se...
- solaxun 8y agoNot sure why you're getting downvoted... I've lived here the same amount of time and absolutely agree. It's maddening the complete inaction and lack of desire to fix the problem.