4 ms·
"or the incredible bureaucracy that de facto prohibits small businesses from participating in the finance or medical industries. " This is a good thing. These
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"or the incredible bureaucracy that de facto prohibits small businesses from participating in the finance or medical industries. "
This is a good thing. These areas are not places where you want to "move fast and break things."
- AnthonyMouse 8y ago> This is a good thing. These areas are not places where you want to "move fast and break things." Nobody wants anybody to "move fast and break things": https://xkcd.com/1428/ https://xkcd.com/1428/ That was the motto of one jerk who nobody likes, who incidentally runs a multi-billion dollar company and not a small business, whose company has since disavowed it, and is in general not how small businesses actually operate. You don't want doctors to "move fast and break things" but you also don't want them to spend 95% of their time filling out paperwork so that medicine becomes so expensive that people go untreated because they can't afford it, or it bankrupts the government. You don't want Nazi experiments but you do want a cure for cancer. There is a trade off here. If you choose wrong people die, no matter which wrong you choose. Which is why the correct solution has more to do with informed consent and less to do with massive regulatory burdens that exclude small entities, increase costs and deter participation.