This same discussion comes up every time FRP is mentioned, because most articles that say they are about FRP are about Reactive Programming using Functional met

This same discussion comes up every time FRP is mentioned, because most articles that say they are about FRP are about Reactive Programming using Functional methods. You can keep bring it up every time you see such a post, but maybe it's better for your own sanity to just realise that ship has sailed: when people write about FRP, they write about this. My job is to write actual FRP so it's no sweat for me to vigorously complain every time that people are stealing "my" term :p While Conal may have distanced himself from FRP, in the Haskell FRP community that's what we still call it.