4 ms·

I see what you mean. I'll be frank, I think that Knuth's analyses have surprisingly fresh and useful approaches, particularly compared with the other algorithm

I see what you mean. I'll be frank, I think that Knuth's analyses have surprisingly fresh and useful approaches, particularly compared with the other algorithms texts I've read. The usual texts are better at compressed results and a "Straight path" through, but as ways of thinking, I find Knuth more useful to study. I wouldn't recommend TAOCP to anyone not interested in algorithms, mind.

pvg 8y ago
Oh, I'm an unrepentant TAOCP and Knuth fanboy. TAOCP is undoubtedly a Great Work™. I'm just bothered by the notion that someone would feel bad or inadequate for not having read it. GEB, on the other hand is... I dunno, an ok monitor riser if you don't have anything else handy.
- tptacek 8y ago
  That's what Cormen/Rivest is for. Much sturdier, too.
  - pvg 8y ago
    You're going to regret that choice when ED-209 breaks into your office and demands a precise definition of big theta within 20 seconds.