3 ms·
>> Well, virtually nobody browsing HN can say they share the pains of the workers of the US that 'suffer when compared with the rest of the world'. Thats a hug
by maze-le 8y ago
>> Well, virtually nobody browsing HN can say they share the pains of the workers of the US that 'suffer when compared with the rest of the world'.
Thats a huge generalization. Not everyone reading HN is a top earning software engineer. Some people are just genuineley inerested in HN-topics but earn their wage with something else entireley. And there are lousy paid IT jobs as well. And there are software developers, that don't live in the US or Western Europe and could be in the same situation. Moreover:
>> All those things are true for the 'disadvantaged', and engineers, technologists, computer scientists etc. are _not_ part of the population
But there are 'disadvantaged' engineers, technologists etc.. There are numerous medical conditions that can make employment nearly impossible, while actual work is possible. Just talk to some HR people if they would hire someone with some sort of chronic disease. Most will be very reluctant, despite the fact that this condition might nevery have material consequences on the work you are doing.
- gota 8y ago>> Thats a huge generalization. True. Although now I'm curious what the proportions are. >> And there are lousy paid IT jobs as well. In comparison to other IT jobs, absolutely. In comparison to other industries, not so much. The most basic jobs in IT pay at least as well as other industries, and more often than not from a little to a lot better, no? Anyway, I doubt there are many IT jobs that pay so little that those workers are stuck in the category the article is broadly laying out, though. Your other points all stand. YOu are correct, but the piece is not about these cases and more about the general state of employment and compensation