3 ms·

I agree it's questionable from a money standpoint, but not updating your browser is questionable from a self-preservation standpoint, as well. (But I also agre

• fauigerzigerk 16y ago
  I don't understand why they're taking that decision away from me. They could just enable auto update by default so most users would always be up-to-date unless they have a reason for disabling it. There are some good reasons other than money as well, such as privacy and security. I don't want my computer updated in any shape or form when I'm on an airport or in an authoritarian country for instance. I don't know whether a Chrome update is dwarfed by regular browsing. The link you posted shows the size of one particular diff update they did. That's a completely worthless measure. The worst case, no doubt, is that everything has to be replaced and that would be 10MB.
  • darren_ 16y ago
    Security-wise I'd be very surprised if Chrome updates weren't signed; MITMing of auto-updates isn't exactly new (see EvilGrade). So I doubt it's an issue there. That said, I agree that there should be an option (not a prominent one) to switch it off.