2 ms·

I think that current implementations of update filters are not ready and satisfactory to make internet a better place, thus I am glad that it is rejected for no

I think that current implementations of update filters are not ready and satisfactory to make internet a better place, thus I am glad that it is rejected for now. When youtube content id matches 10 seconds of black screen as a copyrighted material, it shows that these systems are nowhere near production ready. I am all for fair use and credits when it comes to creators getting paid for what they deserve but, when you need couple of lawyers to dispute something as a student on internet against enterprises, then freedom and equality of Internet disappears.

bkor 8y ago
> I think that current implementations of update filters are not ready There's no one filter nor any way to do this. YouTube designed and implemented a system. Some other sites might have their own design. Most have nothing. Try to think about what's needed to create something like a filter. It's quickly obvious that it's a massive undertaking (expensive). If I'd be Google, I'd actually be happy with a strict law as YouTube has a filter. All other competitors would immediately have a huge disadvantage. Note: I quite like Formula 1 and I've noticed that people quite easily get around the YouTube filter. They make the video a bit smaller, add some moving stuff around it and they're done. This while the filter blocks valid use cases.