It does seem that those criteria would naturally lead to a team with equal participation being judged as more intelligent. What appeals to me most about this a

It does seem that those criteria would naturally lead to a team with equal participation being judged as more intelligent. What appeals to me most about this article is the idea that a team's performance can be measured somewhat objectively. What remains to be seen is whether the team with the highest performance on the artificial tests yielded better performance in real-world scenarios. If it's possible to put together a good team based on simple tests, it would be beneficial to every organization.