https://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/09/business/09defense.html https://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/09/business/09defense.html states that 10 "were originally planned" t

https://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/09/business/09defense.html https://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/09/business/09defense.html states that 10 "were originally planned" though the intro to the wikipedia article says that "the class was intended to take the place of battleships in meeting a congressional mandate for naval fire support," so I'm not going to dispute your clarification because I know that Congress sometimes forces the Navy to buy things the Navy does not want.