2 ms·
0 in 10 is still "no more than 1 in 10", so I don't see why that's scary.
by hueving 8y ago
0 in 10 is still "no more than 1 in 10", so I don't see why that's scary.
- fjsolwmv 8y ago0.9 in 10 is also no more than 1 in 10.
- hueving 8y agoRight, but I'm suggesting that the odds of lighting the atmosphere on fire were calculated to be much lower than 1 in 10, but there just wasn't a 'simple English' category to distinguish them. So I wouldn't get scared until I saw something that suggested it was anywhere near 1 in 10.