3 ms·
There's a similar point made in Foucault's Pendulum by Umberto Eco: http://www.mishkan.com/car.html http://www.mishkan.com/car.html The interpretation of mundan
by wool_gather 8y ago
There's a similar point made in Foucault's Pendulum by Umberto Eco: http://www.mishkan.com/car.html http://www.mishkan.com/car.html The interpretation of mundane documents as some kind of esoteric mystery.
Our brains are really, really good at taking some sparse information and pattern-matching it up to a complex interpretation. And then convincing ourselves that the interpretation is the only one possible.
- perl4ever 8y agoI find this sort of thing very suggestive of some relationship to clinical/psychotic paranoia, and another recent HN thread made me think there might be fundamental challenges of deep learning systems that lead to similar problems: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17438733 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17438733 When I looked at the example at the top of the paper, where Steve Carell is misidentified as Zooey Deschanel, I thought - I can envision the AI saying (anthropomorphically) yes, I know that looks like Steve overall, but just look at those eyes - that has to mean something. Kind of like a conspiracy theorist/paranoiac.
- emmelaich 8y agoLove that book. That passage quite possibly inspired the washing machine manual anecdote.