2 ms·
Oh wait I see where you are going wrong. “The presence of a bank account in fact suggests otherwise; ” Let’s switch out the entities and see what you think. An
by tomtimtall 8y ago
Oh wait I see where you are going wrong. “The presence of a bank account in fact suggests otherwise; ”
Let’s switch out the entities and see what you think. An anonymous blog posts terror threats and links an email @gmail.com, the investigators discover that onion friends have a bank account supporting donations to google. So they raid onion friends.... does that seem justified?
- draugadrotten 8y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_financing#Germany https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_financing#Germany If the onion friends had a donation page up to support a terrorist group, I think they should be monitored by security police and raided if there was a reason. Your case when the bank supports google is not a cause since google is not a terrorist organisation. In this case of the onion friends, the donations seems to have been going to donations to a anonymous mailer web site, and depending on what is done at that web site, raids could be justified or not. I think the "connection" has been established, which CCC would like to say there is none. Yet, in your own example, you seem to admit a connection, just not a cause for a raid.
- twistypencil 8y agoExcept the Onion friends do not have a donation page up to support "a terrorist group"... that is stretching things a bit far.