> What could trustworthy mean if historical archetypes of honesty and great morality are not considered trustworthy? What do the two concepts have in common at

> What could trustworthy mean if historical archetypes of honesty and great morality are not considered trustworthy? What do the two concepts have in common at all? Trustworthy means he will not screw me over if, say, I were to borrow him money. That simply has nothing to do with "who the person" is but only with "what he is like in his personal relationships". Business relationships are very personal and greatly dependent on one's personality. In fact, the "greater" the person (in those historical, societal senses of the word) I'd actually be biased to trust them less even without any knowledge of their otherwise untrustiness.