3 ms·
> However, it should not be difficult to design one for sppech based input. Personally I feel that this shouldn't even be necessary. In theory all you need to
by brandonjm 8y ago
> However, it should not be difficult to design one for sppech based input.
Personally I feel that this shouldn't even be necessary. In theory all you need to be able to vocalise is what you want the code to achieve, then that could be mapped to something similar to a snippet based on what language you are using. Most programming languages share the same core abilities, it's just the syntax to achieve the task that matters once you know what the task is. So this shouldn't need to be handled by a dedicated programming language for voice coding, it could just be handled by a wrapper (A text editor for your voice with an advanced NLP based snippet system).
Something like: "Check if A is equal to B, if it is, return A, if not, return B" would be much more efficient than saying "if parenthesis capital A equals equals captial B..." and so on.
- khitchdee 8y agoI agree. I think a wrapper would be a good way to go about it with the voice based programming interface left only for a high level description of what the programmer is trying to do. Sort of akin to how many of today's new high level languages are actually implmented by translating to C and then using a C complier