3 ms·
Okay, but whose definition of "efficient" are we using here? Space sounds exciting, sure, but Earth still has enough resources that there aren't any goods that
by mmirate 8y ago
Okay, but whose definition of "efficient" are we using here?
Space sounds exciting, sure, but Earth still has enough resources that there aren't any goods that can be produced in space that can't be produced more cheaply on Earth.
- beefield 8y ago> Okay, but whose definition of "efficient" are we using here? That's the problem. I have no better definition. I just have a feeling that the current economics 101 doctrine of free markets just might not be the right answer to all resource allocation problems. (I am vague on purpose who defines what is right and what is wrong. I have no answer to that, either. Just my personal opinion.)