3 ms·
I live in Germany as well (I'm Swiss), and people usually get free time in exchange for overtime and not money around here. I think that explains it better, bec
by kuerbel 8y ago
I live in Germany as well (I'm Swiss), and people usually get free time in exchange for overtime and not money around here. I think that explains it better, because overtime is pretty prevalent - at least in some jobs. Others not so much. You usually don't have to work more than your usual 8 hours/day in a super market. As a software engineer however...
- RobertoG 8y agoI don't know why is necessary to explain anything. Maybe the explanation is that the Germans work less hours. It would be logic, a richer country, a better life. Is that shameful or something?
- kjeetgill 8y agoI think the desire to explain something comes from the data not lining up with expectations. You either want to explain why the data lacks details and reality DOES line up with intuition OR why the intuition was wrong or prejudicial. I get it, stereotypes can suck and make bad null hypotheses but thats how these things go.
- RobertoG 8y agoI get it, but there are two ways to solve it. You can accept the data and change your theory or you can ignore the data and keep your theory. The more simple theory here is, obviously, that the Greeks work more. It bothers me that many people in a community of theoretically science orientated people, as HN, choose the more complicated explanation by default. "thats how these things go" is a really low standard, by the way.
- mmt 8y agoI'm a bit confused as to what your thesis is, but perhaps it's because I'm distracted by the fact that there seems to be a misunderstanding of what the data show. FTA: >The concept used is the total number of hours worked over the year divided by the average number of people in employment. (emphasis mine) My understanding is that the stereotypes are about "Germans" and "Greeks", which implies total populations (presumably defined by residency or nationality or something similar), but that data uses, as a denominator, only that portion of the population which is employed. The inclusion of the population at large, or, more importantly, the population that could be employed, is discussed elsewhere in the thread (outside of the notion of stereotypes) as being a more useful indication of something like labor output (at least as compared with potential total output), especially when compared with GDP.
- SketchySeaBeast 8y ago> people usually get free time in exchange for overtime and not money Either of those are unique among a professional largely salaried.
- toomanybeersies 8y agoI really wish flexitime was a thing in more countries. I'd happily work 45 hours a week in exchange for an extra couple of weeks of annual leave. 4 weeks (Australian standard leave) just isn't long enough for a good trip anywhere, especially since you usually end up burning a week of leave through the year for random things.
- arvinsim 8y agoMost Asian countries only have 15 days annual leaves...
- phillc73 8y agoIt's the same where I work in Austria. By law, I cannot work more than 10 hours a day and a 50 hour week (although maybe this changes to 12 hour days and 60 hours a week maximums soon). Any hours worked in excess of 40 per week become compensatory time. Added to this, 90% of staff where I work have left by latest 14:00 Friday afternoon. This also seems pretty common in Austria generally.