3 ms·
One of these again? These are very low-quality papers compared to the food engineering journal papers you'll find that discuss more detail and even provide bett
by chaosbutters314 8y ago
One of these again? These are very low-quality papers compared to the food engineering journal papers you'll find that discuss more detail and even provide better overview.
This is almost a very pop-sci geared at undergrads.
Are these meant to be published because I'm curious what journals would accept them?
- Naritai 8y agoIt _is_ categorized under the title 'Pop Phyisics'...
- chaosbutters314 8y agothanks! Didn't think arXiv had that type of category
- edmundhuber 8y agoWould you mind linking one, or giving some pointers?
- toomanybeersies 8y agoThis reads like the lecture notes for a 100 level food science class. This is pop science, but I think it's the good kind. It's the kind that teaches people, rather than sensationalized headlines about new discoveries or experiments. We should endeavor to get more people reading these kinds of things. We could make a magazine called Popular Science. Humor aside, I really don't know why this is on arXiv.