3 ms·
Inevitably you'll hear cries of censorship with varying degrees of veracity.
by mizzack 8y ago
Inevitably you'll hear cries of censorship with varying degrees of veracity.
- gnicholas 8y agoI would think that there'd be enough deepfakes on both sides that everyone would recognize that iff there are tools that accurately detect deepfakes, it would be useful to have them enabled on social networks. They don't need to censor the videos — just flag them as having deepfake characteristics.
- mizzack 8y agoLike when Facebook (briefly) tagged articles from certain sources as being disreputable and it led to an _increase_ in clicks to those articles? People will believe what they want to believe. We're also seeing that they don't like mega corps acting as arbiters of truth. So, I'm not sure what, if any, effect this moderation/curation effort would have.
- gnicholas 8y agoI think what we really need is an embarrassing term for "someone who was fooled by a deepfake" (like "catfish"), so that there will be a social stigma that incentivizes people to not be tricked by them. I don't currently have any better ideas that "getting deepfaked". Suggestions?