3 ms·
Come on. A lack of tests or documentation isn't specific to Lisp. TBH, I'd rather use a well-designed DSL than a shitty API.
by olzd 8y ago
Come on. A lack of tests or documentation isn't specific to Lisp. TBH, I'd rather use a well-designed DSL than a shitty API.
- sametmax 8y agoNo it's not, it's way worst when it about new syntax that functions.
- olzd 8y agoAlright, do you have an actual example to show?
- sametmax 8y agoI don't even need to go far, the last comment I had with a lisper on HN ended by : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17128977 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17128977 I don't know what's the worst. That you can't help it or that you won't ever recognize you have a problem. Unfortunaly there is no Lisp Anonymous, so people leave the language. Shame since it's a fantastic tech.
- olzd 8y agoYeah, you managed to link a comment with some code (although I agree it looks useless)... I expected a github link to some lib relying on undocumented macros. > I don't know what's the worst. That you can't help it or that you won't ever recognize you have a problem. Anyone can write bad code. Lisp certainly makes it easier, I won't deny it. And no, I don't have a problem, thank you.