What I understood as the significance of this ruling is that it establishes a different precedent for companies that are considered to participate in "two-sided

What I understood as the significance of this ruling is that it establishes a different precedent for companies that are considered to participate in "two-sided markets" in relation to anti-trust law. I would be curious to hear some commentary on the interview below that discusses this ruling, maybe it would have made for a better submission: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovqjj_hNAYw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovqjj_hNAYw