> Nowhere have I said that if you see an error message you don't know how to program. > making it approachable and stooping to the lowest common denominator.

> Nowhere have I said that if you see an error message you don't know how to program. > making it approachable and stooping to the lowest common denominator. > We agree errors are useful even if we disagree that Clojure's errors are bad. I would assume that you disagree with the article then, in which case I can't make any other point to emphasize that