5 ms·

You make no sense, rather just keep quiet

• dang 8y ago
  Posting like this will get you banned here regardless of how much sense another comment makes. Please don't do this again. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
  • peter_retief 8y ago
    sure, sorry
• nickthemagicman 8y ago
  I mean, supply side vs demand side economics. What's your preference?
  • peter_retief 8y ago
    To stay on point the debate is more about Nietzsche than economics, but yes demand side would define supply side. However there can be a core group of creative innovators that create new wealth from nothing, that's exciting for me. I didn't mean to be rude its just how I speak ;)
    • nickthemagicman 8y ago
      No worries sir! I'm similar. I've been a little rough with my tone before and Dang checked me a little bit. Yeah right on. It's a complicated argument with both sides right to some degree. I'm just not a fan of pure trickle down Ann Rayndian economics. It feels like it's leaving alot of important details out of the equation. I don't believe in wealth creators. I believe in an ecosystem of human beings where some have the luck and/or opportunity to fill certain needs at a certain point in time of the ecosystem to make more resources. Neitzsche's argument seems sufficiently abstract that in can be interpreted to apply to what ever group of people you want.
      • peter_retief 8y ago
        Many people dislike Nietzsche but he is an important. I have only ever read one book on philosophy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_History_of_Western_Philosophy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_History_of_Western_Philosoph... If you ever at a loose end...