Calling this "bipartisan" because they got Kaptur on board is in that "extreme technicality makes this correct" correct category. Kaptur is perhaps one of the m

Calling this "bipartisan" because they got Kaptur on board is in that "extreme technicality makes this correct" correct category. Kaptur is perhaps one of the most pro-intellectual-property-is-the-province-of-corporations folks in the House and in general is tightly aligned with Republican fiscal policy. The linked article links to a draft: http://src.bna.com/z0P http://src.bna.com/z0P It's H.R. 6264: https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/6264 https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/6264 I'm not a patent lawyer but it looks like a bad idea to me. I'm especially nervous given how excited certain orgs who I usually DIS-agree with are hyping it as a solution: https://cpip.gmu.edu/2018/06/29/rep-massie-introduces-new-legislation-to-restore-americas-patent-system/ https://cpip.gmu.edu/2018/06/29/rep-massie-introduces-new-le...