4 ms·

Coca-cola zero - even more harmful [1] [2] [1]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23088901 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23088901 [2]: https://diabete

• Fnoord 8y ago
  That doesn't prove more harmful, that suggests harmful. There's no comparison being made. I read your second source and its a whole lot of text about nothing until they start ranting about artificial sweeteners which are E-numbers deemed safe in the EU. As for your first source, I've heard about those studies. There's no definitive proof on it though. There are some rat strains which are known to be more vulnerable to diseases than others [1] though I'm not sure which strains. I'd like to see it reproduced on a species closer to humans. [1] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jcb.240501220 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jcb.24050122...
• lostmsu 8y ago
  The first study seems flawed from its own description. How can the diet of subjects have the same amount of calories, when one group is consuming high sugar drinks, and the other - calorie free sweeteners?