The claim you could have caught Enron had you knew where to look in their financial statements was never backed up. Given the length of the article it would ha

The claim you could have caught Enron had you knew where to look in their financial statements was never backed up. Given the length of the article it would have been nice if they had quoted concrete facts instead of vaguely alluding to evidence that may or may not exist. There were also lots of concrete examples they could have used such as Crazy Eddie using their best looking secretaries to distract the auditors. Instead the article gives a false sense of certainty to what is really a long opinion piece. I say this even though I agree with its thesis.