4 ms·
I skimmed through because it sounds fairly click-baity... From what I gather, they're claiming to have solved NP-complete problems to some degree with some abst
by leetbulb 8y ago
I skimmed through because it sounds fairly click-baity... From what I gather, they're claiming to have solved NP-complete problems to some degree with some abstract form algorithm? I'm genuinely interested, if anyone can explain what's going on...
- ajb 8y agoThe article doesn't even mention NP-completeness. Nor does the paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.06355.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.06355.pdf Haven't read enough yet to comment otherwise, but let's not spread rumours.
- justinclift 8y agoThe abstract seems to be comparing having to search an entire problem space for the most optimal result ("the current approach") with an approach using sampling for a good enough result?
- allenz 8y agoSubmodular maximization is indeed NP-complete, but we can find approximate solutions in polynomial time. This paper speeds up the parallel running time of the approximation from O(n) to O(log n), meaning that they've found a way to make the algorithm more parallelizable, though you still have to do the same amount of work.
- leetbulb 8y agoGot it! Thanks!