3 ms·
Eh, more often than not, it's pretty clear who at least one of the authors of the paper is by just looking at what they cite. Double blind review is not a foolp
by spiderjerusalem 8y ago
Eh, more often than not, it's pretty clear who at least one of the authors of the paper is by just looking at what they cite. Double blind review is not a foolproof system of avoiding creds and appeals to authority.
- Mxtetris 8y agoFrom an article [0] published in last month's CACM, describing attempts by three 2016 conferences to anonymize papers: We find that anonymization is imperfect but fairly effective: 70%–86% of the reviews were submitted with no author guesses, and 74%–90% of reviews were submitted with no correct guesses. [0] https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2018/6/228027-effectiveness-of-anonymization-in-double-blind-review/fulltext https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2018/6/228027-effectiveness-o...