3 ms·
But then again the use of colors in an image conveys meaning. That does not mean that there should be alt texts for each color channel. The alternative content
by olavk 16y ago
But then again the use of colors in an image conveys meaning. That does not mean that there should be alt texts for each color channel. The alternative content should be provided at a level that makes sense if you don't have access to the specific media.
The HTML5 spec specifically addresses accessibility for video like this:
To make video content accessible to the blind, deaf, and those with other physical or cognitive disabilities, authors are expected to provide alternative media streams and/or to embed accessibility aids (such as caption or subtitle tracks, audio description tracks, or sign-language overlays) into their media streams. (http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/video.html#attr-video-poster http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/...)
This is much more sensible that providing an alt text for the first frame in the video.
- devmonk 16y agoThe standard should support an accessible version of what is staticly and dynamically displayed in the browser to a non-disabled person. If a non-disabled person will always see that frame on load, that frame needs an accessible way of making sense of that frame.
- olavk 16y agoThat ignores the content/presentation distinction which is essential for providing real accessibility.