4 ms·
Source? Wouldn't these people need to be specifically from the search team, and not Google in general (which would have almost no control over search)
by trendia 8y ago
Source?
Wouldn't these people need to be specifically from the search team, and not Google in general (which would have almost no control over search)
- stcredzero 8y agoGoogle keeps on demoting sites in search for doing certain things. In the past, this has largely been good. This stance against piracy and the stance that YouTube has taken against the principles of free speech mark a trajectory I find disturbing.
- pdelbarba 8y agoI see it as a concerning second phase to citizens united. Give corporations virtually unlimited influence and watch as they also find ways of capping everyone else's influence. Google sticks you into your (their) filter bubble and Facebook performs the social equivalent to gerrymandering on their platform. WCGW?
- stingraycharles 8y agoGoing from “their stance against piracy” to “socially engineer everyone for better using their power” is quite a leap and strikes me as overly dramatic / FUD.
- kodablah 8y agoIt was very clear that one was about what a contingent in the company believes and another is about what the company does. It strikes me as quite the leap and overly dramatic to compare specific quotes about different things just because they're in the same thread.