3 ms·

> But this doesn't seem to account for the site being completely delisted from Google on such searches as "polygraph" and "lie detector." It's not delisted, it

by dewey 8y ago

> But this doesn't seem to account for the site being completely delisted from Google on such searches as "polygraph" and "lie detector." It's not delisted, it's just not on the first page as other users also reported and I just verified myself. With every change of the ranking algorithm there's a bunch of sites going up or down and nobody can tell you the exact reason why - it's easy to just call it censorship but in reality it's probably something else. Like the top comment already explained that your site markup has a bunch of missing information that makes it hard for search engines to properly scrape you.

wolco 8y ago
The markup rules were downgraded years ago. No h1 or title or meta tags shouldn't be the primary cause. Probably more to do with https, mobile and amp than the above factors. Google has no problem scraping html pages and getting importance and content topics from inbound links, social media links and the actual text on the page.
falcolas 8y ago
> With every change of the ranking algorithm there's a bunch of sites going up or down and nobody can tell you the exact reason why And that is a problem. No company with as much influence on the web as Google has should be able to hide behind a phrase such as "it's just the algorithm". "De-rank every web site with the word humuhumunukunukuapua’a" is an algorithm too. Every ranking should have a very clear reason, and legitimate web sites (yes, this is a judgement call, but a site with a history like this one would qualify) should have access to that reasoning behind their ranking.
- dewey 8y ago
  But isn't the reason that the exact ranking algorithms and factors are not public mostly to prevent people from gaming the system? If the exact formula for being the best ranked result would be public every seo-spam site would adapt to them too and everything becomes irrelevant again.
ap_org 8y ago
What search term(s) did you use, and on what page of results did AntiPolygraph.org appear?
- e2e8 8y ago
  The google search "beat a polygraph" gives antipolygraph.org as result number 10. The google search "pass a polygraph" gives antipolygraph.org as result number 11. The google search "polygraph" give antipolygraph.org as result number 188.

by dewey 8y ago

wolco 8y ago

The markup rules were downgraded years ago. No h1 or title or meta tags shouldn't be the primary cause. Probably more to do with https, mobile and amp than the above factors. Google has no problem scraping html pages and getting importance and content topics from inbound links, social media links and the actual text on the page.

falcolas 8y ago

> With every change of the ranking algorithm there's a bunch of sites going up or down and nobody can tell you the exact reason why And that is a problem. No company with as much influence on the web as Google has should be able to hide behind a phrase such as "it's just the algorithm". "De-rank every web site with the word humuhumunukunukuapua’a" is an algorithm too. Every ranking should have a very clear reason, and legitimate web sites (yes, this is a judgement call, but a site with a history like this one would qualify) should have access to that reasoning behind their ranking.

dewey 8y ago
But isn't the reason that the exact ranking algorithms and factors are not public mostly to prevent people from gaming the system? If the exact formula for being the best ranked result would be public every seo-spam site would adapt to them too and everything becomes irrelevant again.

ap_org 8y ago

What search term(s) did you use, and on what page of results did AntiPolygraph.org appear?

e2e8 8y ago
The google search "beat a polygraph" gives antipolygraph.org as result number 10. The google search "pass a polygraph" gives antipolygraph.org as result number 11. The google search "polygraph" give antipolygraph.org as result number 188.