I would put it differently: it is often easier to agitate people to be against something than convincing them of the good of something. In a democracy, politic

I would put it differently: it is often easier to agitate people to be against something than convincing them of the good of something. In a democracy, politicians need a power base made up of followers (future voters). The more, the better. And when the right conditions meet, sowing a seed of destructive opposition leads to a plentiful harvest of loyal voters. Why people fall for this mostly nationalistic rhetoric that opposes the EU is quite complex. I don't think that I have a good enough picture of that to say more about it.