3 ms·
I'm not saying that it isn't exciting for sure, but Diaspora as the sole namedrop product out of that? Not that Diaspora isn't cool, but it is an unhosted, alp
by devmonk 16y ago
I'm not saying that it isn't exciting for sure, but Diaspora as the sole namedrop product out of that?
Not that Diaspora isn't cool, but it is an unhosted, alpha-grade, open-source project with no apparent business model competing with Facebook. It won't make money.
Interested in Diaspora? Check out this recent review:
http://mybroadband.co.za/news/internet/15283-Open-social-networking-Diaspora-tested.html http://mybroadband.co.za/news/internet/15283-Open-social-net...
I think it is great, and I'm sure it will do well as a free product, but really- was that the only group worth mentioning? Even if they host the product and trying to compete with Facebook, according to what I've read, you have to overtake an established market using 3x of the funds your competitor puts into it. 3x what Facebook burns? I'm not sure that the improvements it makes in display of photos and security are enough to overwhelm FB. It isn't going after much of a niche need unless you consider it being open-source a niche.
- wccrawford 16y agoOvercoming someone that spends 3x as much as you isn't as hard as you might think. Especially if they aren't spending that money wisely.
- devmonk 16y agoDo you truly think that Diaspora has a significant chance where it is positioned right now to overtake Facebook or gain a significant part of their market share in even 3-7 years? Think of all of the really major open-source projects. Now think to yourself, if I was a VC, would I have put money into those developing those projects if my goal was to have at least 10x return? Now think about those projects once more. Was there any single product significantly established in the same market that those products had to overcome when they started, say with the size and spending of Facebook, with a recent movie out about their founder?