3 ms·
Because you set a goal and did not meet it with 100% completion does not define failure. If that's the case your argument holds true to, likely, every auto manu
by windexh8er 8y ago
Because you set a goal and did not meet it with 100% completion does not define failure. If that's the case your argument holds true to, likely, every auto manufacturer quarter over quarter. That's a very diluted perspective across the board.
- wpietri 8y agoYou keep responding to things I didn't say, while ignoring the inconvenient things I did say. So I think we're done here. But just to be clear, I'm saying his repeated failure to hit goals is the not the definition of failure, but rather the sign of a severe process problem.