3 ms·
But doesn't that mean that it would be cheaper for an adversary to just wait until the excessive military spending makes the US implode, figuratively, in debt?
by rolandog 8y ago
But doesn't that mean that it would be cheaper for an adversary to just wait until the excessive military spending makes the US implode, figuratively, in debt? This same concern worried former president Eisenhower back in his days[0].
A similar argument is usually touted regarding the economic strain that the 'Space Race' caused the U.S.S.R.[1].
[0] "The Cold War: An International History", p. 42-43 https://books.google.com/books?id=Yv2FAgAAQBAJ&lpg=PA43&pg=PA43#v=onepage https://books.google.com/books?id=Yv2FAgAAQBAJ&lpg=PA43&pg=P...
[1] "Comparison of US and Estimated Soviet Expenditures for Space Programs", p. 3-4, https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000316255.pdf https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000316255....
- aphextron 8y agoThe Space Race bankrupted an already failing command economy in the USSR. However it was a massive economic boon for US capitalists, as evidenced by our aerospace and defense industries today. The great thing about defense spending is that it is almost entirely domestic. We're not running up some huge trade deficit with a foreign power. It creates millions of jobs from Florida to California.
- Koshkin 8y agoOn the other hand, see https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable_of_the_broken_window https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable_of_the_broken_window.
- woolvalley 8y agoThat only works if you can survive the overspend, because it's being used to actively destroy you at the moment.
- rolandog 8y agoAh, ... I see they've cut back on the education and civility budgets to accommodate for more military spending.