This is true in the same sense that "a JIT" should really be "a JIT compiler." Used as "a JIT," the term is given new meaning (to refer to a compiler implicitl

This is true in the same sense that "a JIT" should really be "a JIT compiler." Used as "a JIT," the term is given new meaning (to refer to a compiler implicitly). And used as "JIT language," its giving the term a new meating (to refer to the fact that the language designed to be JITted).