2 ms·
Maybe it's indicative of which sort of conversations I choose to participate in, but I rarely see comment sections go beyond the page fold. Supposing we take y
by JackCh 8y ago
Maybe it's indicative of which sort of conversations I choose to participate in, but I rarely see comment sections go beyond the page fold.
Supposing we take your argument seriously though, comments past the page fold which also have their contrast lowered to the point of illegibility are certainly censored even moreso.
- pvg 8y agoIt only takes a dozen short comments or so even on a giant screen. And yes, almost everything is censorship if you redefine censorship to mean any random irksome thing. Incidentally, I do think the way the comment fading works is pointedly user-hating and dumb (it's traditionally dumb, though!), but it's not really censorship. More generally, since we're talking about taking things seriously, framing forum irritants as some sort of oppression is a solid way to ensure few people take you seriously.
- JackCh 8y agoI don't think that describing a system which deliberately suppresses the legibility of posts you've already scrolled to see as 'soft censorship' is an unreasonable "redefinition" of censorship. If you disagree, I suppose I consider you unreasonable.
- pvg 8y agoVery well. I have added 'soft unreasonable' to my profile.