4 ms·
It's not enough money to live OP's lifestyle in the bay area. SLC was given as just one example of a city where it is.
by robotrout 8y ago
It's not enough money to live OP's lifestyle in the bay area. SLC was given as just one example of a city where it is.
- vostok 8y agoSLC is not a nice, dense urban city in the way that Berlin is. It thus would not provide OP's lifestyle at any level of income. It is disingenuous to equate the two.
- robotrout 8y agoIt is also disingenuous to conveniently omit the fact that Berlin, as a major German city, enjoys economic benefits gained at the expense of other EU member countries. There's no such thing as a free lunch.
- ameister14 8y agoCool - Houston, then.
- TheCoelacanth 8y agoIs that supposed to be a joke? Houston has a similar lifestyle to Berlin?
- ameister14 8y agoMid-size city, similar size and population, more affordable. Living in the city and owning your own home there with one job is completely doable, as is childcare. Usually 'lifestyle' in the context of affordability is used to describe a set of activities that cost a certain amount. Like eating out, going to the movies, having multiple cars, etc.
- TheCoelacanth 8y agoHouston is probably one of the least walkable cities in existence. It is nothing like Berlin.
- T2_t2 8y agoName ANYWHERE like Berlin. Surely that's the question? You can't swap Berlin for anywhere, surely? It is majorly disingenuous to choose Berlin, or Rome, or London, Or Paris, or Tokyo and ask for a similar place. There is NOWHERE like these cities. There can't be. That is their unique charm.