4 ms·

I'd love to see * Number of Employees * Monthly Active Users * Server Operating Costs * Monthly Revenue for * Reddit * Fark * Slashdot * Digg I'd assu

by mey 16y ago

I'd love to see * Number of Employees * Monthly Active Users * Server Operating Costs * Monthly Revenue for * Reddit * Fark * Slashdot * Digg I'd assume the other sites would bury Digg (no pun intended) on at least several of those fronts.

SwellJoe 16y ago
reddit has more daily pageviews than digg by a few tens of millions, reportedly. So, their 6(?) person team is outperforming 100+ digg employees in the most important metric (revenue might be more important, but I'm not so sure...if I could pick a site to own, I'd choose the one that is bigger, growing faster, and has dramatically lower expenses).
- jack7890 16y ago
  Source?
  - Homunculiheaded 16y ago
    As for reddit's size compared to digg here's the infographic: http://i.imgur.com/jiHka.png http://i.imgur.com/jiHka.png you can google around and find other sites that go into greater detail on this. And they currently have 5 engineers (believe this is their entire staff), this post is them pleading for extra funding for the fifth engineer: http://blog.reddit.com/2010/07/reddit-needs-help.html http://blog.reddit.com/2010/07/reddit-needs-help.html
    - rms 16y ago
      Reddit also has a non-technical community manager (though I wouldn't be surprised if they got him programming by now). http://www.reddit.com/user/hueypriest http://www.reddit.com/user/hueypriest Hacker News could actually really benefit from one of those.
    - SwellJoe 16y ago
      This once again demonstrates that the Wired folks have moments of sheer brilliance, and then they fail to follow it through to its most logical conclusion. Acquiring reddit (for a rumored few millions) was a stroke of amazing luck for Wired/Conde Nast. But, now that everyone can look at the situation and do apples to apples comparisons with Digg and see that it's a far superior community and technology in pretty much every measurable metric, and worth at least as much as Digg, the reddit guys are struggling to pay for enough engineers and machines to keep the thing running smoothly and fast. Part of that problem is I think that the guys best equipped to grow it (Steve and Alexis) have both moved on; the remaining guys are very smart, but I think they were hired for their engineering abilities rather than entrepreneurial strengths. And, I imagine they left partly because they were dissatisfied with their ability to grow and lead from within the Conde Nast organization.
      - wvenable 16y ago
        Another way to think of it is that neither digg nor reddit are actually worth that much -- lots of traffic, yes, but no way to monetize it. Conde Nast might just be doing things right, financially, with regards to reddit.
        SwellJoe 16y ago
        I can't wrap my head around the idea that 300 million deeply interested eyeballs every day is not "worth that much". It's at least worth more than a staff of six. Though, I do think Digg has been pretty much valued out of any reasonable exit by raising too much money, and the lack of vision on the part of leadership as exhibited by the tepid new version of Digg (which caters to marketers and major media to the point of absurdity for a "social" site) pretty much insures there's no way to build to something dramatically more valuable. Even if they were to learn from their mistakes, with a staff and infrastructure that big, they'll run out of money before they find their way.
        wvenable 16y ago
        > 300 million deeply interested eyeballs In the case of reddit, it's userbase is very difficult to monetize -- they've said as much themselves. I think the less you can monetize something the more likely you'll have a lot of users; once you start doing things to monetize your userbase they get annoyed and simply move on. I think any one of these sites is bad investment because those 300 million users can come and go in an instant. Digg could simply be over now and just takes a few people a few months to throw out the next big thing.
- bapadna 16y ago
  why are pageviews more important than visits, unique visitors or revenue?
  - deleted 16y ago
    [deleted]
  - SwellJoe 16y ago
    User engagement. A visitor that spends hours on the site each day, producing content in the form of discussion, is worth a lot more than a visitor that drops in for two minutes in order to spew some spam into the queue, and then leave. I don't think there's any question that the reddit community is more engaged than the digg community...a brief perusal of the comments at both sites will quickly eliminate any doubt. As for revenue, I said that more pageviews and much faster growth from a much leaner organization was better. There were several variables in my statements. Besides, it is not a small difference in pageviews. It's ~40%! Which pretty much certainly equates to more visits and more unique visitors than digg. No matter how you slice it, though, digg is a 100+ person operation that is generating less value to consumers than a 6 person operation. Value to consumers is a reasonable proxy for the kind of revenue you can generate from a site. They just haven't found the formula for monetizing it yet. It doesn't mean the value isn't there.
    - bapadna 16y ago
      There were several variables in my statements. Just a friendly reminder, you referred to pageviews as "the most important metric", thus my question. User engagement... While pageviews can be used as a mediocre proxy for user engagement, I don't think it proves your thesis at all. Which is more valuable, 5x the uniques, or a smaller group who loads more pages? Depend on additional variables, no? Which pretty much certainly equates to more visits and more unique visitors than digg. As far as I can tell (using compete pro), pageviews is the only metric where reddit wins, with digg winning handily in the others. Digg seems to have 5x the uniques, and 50% more visits. This strikes me as accurate, since reddit is focused on comments, and digg seems to focus more on links. that is generating less value to consumers How are you measuring that? Are you asserting that reddit creates more value than digg, but they fail to effectively monetize and capture it? Or are you asserting that reddit's value is non-monetary, but still worth paying for?
mkramlich 16y ago
also for HN

by mey 16y ago

SwellJoe 16y ago

reddit has more daily pageviews than digg by a few tens of millions, reportedly. So, their 6(?) person team is outperforming 100+ digg employees in the most important metric (revenue might be more important, but I'm not so sure...if I could pick a site to own, I'd choose the one that is bigger, growing faster, and has dramatically lower expenses).

jack7890 16y ago
Source?
- Homunculiheaded 16y ago
  As for reddit's size compared to digg here's the infographic: http://i.imgur.com/jiHka.png http://i.imgur.com/jiHka.png you can google around and find other sites that go into greater detail on this. And they currently have 5 engineers (believe this is their entire staff), this post is them pleading for extra funding for the fifth engineer: http://blog.reddit.com/2010/07/reddit-needs-help.html http://blog.reddit.com/2010/07/reddit-needs-help.html
  - rms 16y ago
    Reddit also has a non-technical community manager (though I wouldn't be surprised if they got him programming by now). http://www.reddit.com/user/hueypriest http://www.reddit.com/user/hueypriest Hacker News could actually really benefit from one of those.
  - SwellJoe 16y ago
    This once again demonstrates that the Wired folks have moments of sheer brilliance, and then they fail to follow it through to its most logical conclusion. Acquiring reddit (for a rumored few millions) was a stroke of amazing luck for Wired/Conde Nast. But, now that everyone can look at the situation and do apples to apples comparisons with Digg and see that it's a far superior community and technology in pretty much every measurable metric, and worth at least as much as Digg, the reddit guys are struggling to pay for enough engineers and machines to keep the thing running smoothly and fast. Part of that problem is I think that the guys best equipped to grow it (Steve and Alexis) have both moved on; the remaining guys are very smart, but I think they were hired for their engineering abilities rather than entrepreneurial strengths. And, I imagine they left partly because they were dissatisfied with their ability to grow and lead from within the Conde Nast organization.
    - wvenable 16y ago
      Another way to think of it is that neither digg nor reddit are actually worth that much -- lots of traffic, yes, but no way to monetize it. Conde Nast might just be doing things right, financially, with regards to reddit.
      - SwellJoe 16y ago
        I can't wrap my head around the idea that 300 million deeply interested eyeballs every day is not "worth that much". It's at least worth more than a staff of six. Though, I do think Digg has been pretty much valued out of any reasonable exit by raising too much money, and the lack of vision on the part of leadership as exhibited by the tepid new version of Digg (which caters to marketers and major media to the point of absurdity for a "social" site) pretty much insures there's no way to build to something dramatically more valuable. Even if they were to learn from their mistakes, with a staff and infrastructure that big, they'll run out of money before they find their way.
        wvenable 16y ago
        > 300 million deeply interested eyeballs In the case of reddit, it's userbase is very difficult to monetize -- they've said as much themselves. I think the less you can monetize something the more likely you'll have a lot of users; once you start doing things to monetize your userbase they get annoyed and simply move on. I think any one of these sites is bad investment because those 300 million users can come and go in an instant. Digg could simply be over now and just takes a few people a few months to throw out the next big thing.
bapadna 16y ago
why are pageviews more important than visits, unique visitors or revenue?
- deleted 16y ago
  [deleted]
- SwellJoe 16y ago
  User engagement. A visitor that spends hours on the site each day, producing content in the form of discussion, is worth a lot more than a visitor that drops in for two minutes in order to spew some spam into the queue, and then leave. I don't think there's any question that the reddit community is more engaged than the digg community...a brief perusal of the comments at both sites will quickly eliminate any doubt. As for revenue, I said that more pageviews and much faster growth from a much leaner organization was better. There were several variables in my statements. Besides, it is not a small difference in pageviews. It's ~40%! Which pretty much certainly equates to more visits and more unique visitors than digg. No matter how you slice it, though, digg is a 100+ person operation that is generating less value to consumers than a 6 person operation. Value to consumers is a reasonable proxy for the kind of revenue you can generate from a site. They just haven't found the formula for monetizing it yet. It doesn't mean the value isn't there.
  - bapadna 16y ago
    There were several variables in my statements. Just a friendly reminder, you referred to pageviews as "the most important metric", thus my question. User engagement... While pageviews can be used as a mediocre proxy for user engagement, I don't think it proves your thesis at all. Which is more valuable, 5x the uniques, or a smaller group who loads more pages? Depend on additional variables, no? Which pretty much certainly equates to more visits and more unique visitors than digg. As far as I can tell (using compete pro), pageviews is the only metric where reddit wins, with digg winning handily in the others. Digg seems to have 5x the uniques, and 50% more visits. This strikes me as accurate, since reddit is focused on comments, and digg seems to focus more on links. that is generating less value to consumers How are you measuring that? Are you asserting that reddit creates more value than digg, but they fail to effectively monetize and capture it? Or are you asserting that reddit's value is non-monetary, but still worth paying for?

mkramlich 16y ago

also for HN