3 ms·
In this case, it's worth pointing out that the zeta function admits a functional definition in which you can define some points of the function about their "ref
by hardlianotion 8y ago
In this case, it's worth pointing out that the zeta function admits a functional definition in which you can define some points of the function about their "reflection" in the line Re(z) = 1/2. This allows a perfectly rigorous definition of the function for values like -1. One might call the functional form more fundamental and note that the series form only holds true for Re(z) > 1.