4 ms·
The subtext, whether it's intentional or not, seems to be that the gender of manager that he (yes, assuming OP's gender) spoke to is relevant to the negativity
by not_kurt_godel 8y ago
The subtext, whether it's intentional or not, seems to be that the gender of manager that he (yes, assuming OP's gender) spoke to is relevant to the negativity of the experience. The message can be condensed down to "female + new Apple = bad, male + old Apple = good"
- mehrdadn 8y agoWhat I'm baffled about is why the comparison was made against the contact's gender. How would involving the contact's gender have helped? Or if that's not the question that was intended, then why not ask the actual question that was intended?
- paulcole 8y agoHow does involving the manager’s gender help?
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- mehrdadn 8y agoI don't know, I never claimed it does.
- paulcole 8y agoSo you’re not baffled by the use of “woman manager”?
- mehrdadn 8y agoIn fact that question did pop up in my mind too, and hence I did upvote the other commenter's question asking about that. But I find it curious that why you're pressing on interrogating me like this. Why the inquisition?