Ah sorry, I was relying on the parent comment's statement that they hadn't published numbers. Hadn't actually checked myself. Glad that they did though. That b

Ah sorry, I was relying on the parent comment's statement that they hadn't published numbers. Hadn't actually checked myself. Glad that they did though. That being said, those data numbers seem extremely small. In reading the paper, I see that they attempted to augment it a bit. But it still seems near meaningless given the tiny sample set.