3 ms·
Strictly speaking most modern (two-player) games are two-player asymmetrical, since one player has a first-mover advantage. Not what you meant of course, but wo
by a1369209993 8y ago
Strictly speaking most modern (two-player) games are two-player asymmetrical, since one player has a first-mover advantage. Not what you meant of course, but worth considering; it's somewhat hard to make a game that's strictly symmetric.
- Someone 8y agoRock-paper-scissors is strictly symmetrical. Diplomacy would be, if started on a symmetrical map. Also, take any two-player game, and create a new game where the players play the original game twice, switching sides, and you end up with a symmetrical game. If you play both games in parallel, where each player can choose in which source game to play on each turn, I think you still end up with a symmetrical game (in some sense)