Perhaps only remote hacking where you are not physically in the same location as what you are hacking (or have not caused any physical alterations). This kind o

Perhaps only remote hacking where you are not physically in the same location as what you are hacking (or have not caused any physical alterations). This kind of "hacking" should be entirely stoppable and entirely non-violent. Since it is stoppable, companies can stop all hacking. It will incentivise hacking, and thus incentivise companies to actually take security seriously. This is different to decriminalising robberies because you cannot actually stop all robberies unlike remote hacking. Or at least there is a real possibility of harm during the cause of a stopped robbery. Stopping a remote hacking attempt won't cause physical harm, though perhaps it could cause financial harm. I'm not including attacks like denial of service when I say "hacking".